Sympathy with Adam Smith and reflexions on self
نویسنده
چکیده
AdamSmith’s account of themoral sentiments resonateswithmodern themes in evolutionary biology. His distinction between our reasons and the reasons for these reasons recalls the evolutionary biologist’s emphasis on different levels of causal explanation. In this view, the proximate goals of our psychologicalmotivations are different in kind from the ultimate reasons why we have evolved these motivations. Sympathy was central to Smith’s account of themoral sentiments and he discussed two principal forms of sympathy. Second-person sympathy is putting ourselves in another person’s situation to see theworld from their perspective. Third-person sympathy is viewing ourselves from the perspective of an impartial observer. In recent discussions of the evolution of cooperation, second-person sympathy facilitates cooperation via direct reciprocity, I behave well by you so that you will behave well by me, whereas third-person sympathy facilitates cooperation via indirect reciprocity, I behave well by you so that others will behave well by me. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Religion and Spirituality: Adam Smith versus J-J Rousseau
Adam Smith and J-J Rousseau share some common ground when it comes to religion, namely that they were born into and educated in cultural contexts deeply shaped by Reformed Christianity. However, close consideration of their writings on religion reveal marked difference. This paper explores those differences and finds that Rousseau and Smith are radically at odds on this score. Smith has almost...
متن کاملEmpathy’s purity, sympathy’s complexities; De Waal, Darwin and Adam Smith
Frans de Waal's view that empathy is at the basis of morality directly seems to build on Darwin, who considered sympathy as the crucial instinct. Yet when we look closer, their understanding of the central social instinct differs considerably. De Waal sees our deeply ingrained tendency to sympathize (or rather: empathize) with others as the good side of our morally dualistic nature. For Darwin,...
متن کاملImagine-Self Perspective-Taking and Rational Self-Interested Behavior in a Simple Experimental Normal-Form Game
The purpose of this study is to explore the link between imagine-self perspective-taking and rational self-interested behavior in experimental normal-form games. Drawing on the concept of sympathy developed by Adam Smith and further literature on perspective-taking in games, we hypothesize that introduction of imagine-self perspective-taking by decision-makers promotes rational self-interested ...
متن کاملOn sympathy and games ¬リニ
Standard game theory turns a blind eye toward social interaction between the players in a game. Hence, a given game offers the same set of equilibria regardless of the identities of the players and the specifics of the social context. The predictive value of game theory is severely limited as a result. This paper provides a formal treatment of games set in a context of social interaction. Based...
متن کاملHume and Smith on Sympathy , Approbation , and Moral Judgment
David Hume and Adam Smith are usually, and understandably, seen as developing very similar sentimentalist accounts of moral thought and practice. Hume’s views are better known, not least because Smith’s work on moral sentiments fell in the shadow of his tremendously influential Wealth of Nations. This shadowing is unfortunate, both because Smith’s work on moral sentiments is deeply insightful a...
متن کامل